Ant3D is a fisheye multi‑camera system for 3D mapping in confined environments, designed and refined over a seven‑year period. This paper has two aims: to present the latest tests reflecting recent system developments and to summarize the design journey and milestones. We compare three successive surveys tests conducted in the same challenging test site: meandering masonry interiors and rock‑cut passages within San Vigilio Castle (Bergamo, Italy). The 2018 test used a low‑cost GoPro multi‑camera rig; the 2020 test used Ant3D v1, a custom prototype improved based on the previous experiences; the 2025 test employed the first industrialized Atom‑Ant3D, integrating SLAM‑based pose estimation, pose‑graph optimization, and SLAM‑aided SfM to accelerate processing. The comparison considers reconstruction drift against a TLS ground‑truth point cloud and processing times. Results show Ant3D v1 achieves high accuracy (max deviation ~3cm) but required extensive processing times (~20h), Atom‑Ant3D offers major time savings (~4.5h) with moderate accuracy trade‑offs, and the GoPro rig performs worst. The discussion outlines design and processing guidelines for reliable, fast mapping of narrow spaces.

Ant3D: Evolution of a Multi-Camera Fisheye System for 3D Mapping in Confined Spaces

Perfetti L.;Fassi F.;Sgrenzaroli M.;Vassena G. P. M.
2026-01-01

Abstract

Ant3D is a fisheye multi‑camera system for 3D mapping in confined environments, designed and refined over a seven‑year period. This paper has two aims: to present the latest tests reflecting recent system developments and to summarize the design journey and milestones. We compare three successive surveys tests conducted in the same challenging test site: meandering masonry interiors and rock‑cut passages within San Vigilio Castle (Bergamo, Italy). The 2018 test used a low‑cost GoPro multi‑camera rig; the 2020 test used Ant3D v1, a custom prototype improved based on the previous experiences; the 2025 test employed the first industrialized Atom‑Ant3D, integrating SLAM‑based pose estimation, pose‑graph optimization, and SLAM‑aided SfM to accelerate processing. The comparison considers reconstruction drift against a TLS ground‑truth point cloud and processing times. Results show Ant3D v1 achieves high accuracy (max deviation ~3cm) but required extensive processing times (~20h), Atom‑Ant3D offers major time savings (~4.5h) with moderate accuracy trade‑offs, and the GoPro rig performs worst. The discussion outlines design and processing guidelines for reliable, fast mapping of narrow spaces.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W12-2026-375-2026.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Full Text
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 3.35 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.35 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/645746
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact