Purpose We hypothesised that during a rest-to-exercise transient in hypoxia (H), compared to normoxia (N), (i) the initial baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) decrease would be slower and (ii) the fast heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO) response would have smaller amplitude (A(1)) due to lower vagal activity in H than N. Methods Ten participants performed three rest-to-50 W exercise transients on a cycle-ergometer in N (ambient air) and three in H (inspired fraction of O-2 = 0.11). R-to-R interval (RRi, by electrocardiography) and blood pressure profile (by photo-plethysmography) were recorded non-invasively. Analysis of the latter provided mean arterial pressure (MAP) and stroke volume (SV). CO = HRSV. BRS was calculated by modified sequence method. Results Upon exercise onset in N, MAP fell to a minimum (MAPmin) then recovered. BRS decreased immediately from 14.7 +/- 3.6 at rest to 7.0 +/- 3.0 ms mmHg(-1) at 50 W (p < 0.01). The first BRS sequence detected at 50 W was 8.9 +/- 4.8 ms mmHg(-1) (p < 0.05 vs. rest). In H, MAP showed several oscillations until reaching a new steady state. BRS decreased rapidly from 10.6 +/- 2.8 at rest to 2.9 +/- 1.5 ms mmHg(-1) at 50 W (p < 0.01), as the first BRS sequence at 50 W was 5.8 +/- 2.6 ms mmHg(-1) (p < 0.01 vs. rest). CO-A(1) was 2.96 +/- 1.51 and 2.31 +/- 0.94 l min(-1) in N and H, respectively (p = 0.06). HR-A(1) was 7.7 +/- 4.6 and 7.1 +/- 5.9 min(-1) in N and H, respectively (p = 0.81). Conclusion The immediate BRS decrease in H, coupled with similar rapid HR and CO responses, is compatible with a withdrawal of residual vagal activity in H associated with increased sympathetic drive.

Baroreflex dynamics during the rest to exercise transient in acute normobaric hypoxia in humans

Taboni A.
;
Fagoni N.;Vinetti G.;Ferretti G.
2024-01-01

Abstract

Purpose We hypothesised that during a rest-to-exercise transient in hypoxia (H), compared to normoxia (N), (i) the initial baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) decrease would be slower and (ii) the fast heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO) response would have smaller amplitude (A(1)) due to lower vagal activity in H than N. Methods Ten participants performed three rest-to-50 W exercise transients on a cycle-ergometer in N (ambient air) and three in H (inspired fraction of O-2 = 0.11). R-to-R interval (RRi, by electrocardiography) and blood pressure profile (by photo-plethysmography) were recorded non-invasively. Analysis of the latter provided mean arterial pressure (MAP) and stroke volume (SV). CO = HRSV. BRS was calculated by modified sequence method. Results Upon exercise onset in N, MAP fell to a minimum (MAPmin) then recovered. BRS decreased immediately from 14.7 +/- 3.6 at rest to 7.0 +/- 3.0 ms mmHg(-1) at 50 W (p < 0.01). The first BRS sequence detected at 50 W was 8.9 +/- 4.8 ms mmHg(-1) (p < 0.05 vs. rest). In H, MAP showed several oscillations until reaching a new steady state. BRS decreased rapidly from 10.6 +/- 2.8 at rest to 2.9 +/- 1.5 ms mmHg(-1) at 50 W (p < 0.01), as the first BRS sequence at 50 W was 5.8 +/- 2.6 ms mmHg(-1) (p < 0.01 vs. rest). CO-A(1) was 2.96 +/- 1.51 and 2.31 +/- 0.94 l min(-1) in N and H, respectively (p = 0.06). HR-A(1) was 7.7 +/- 4.6 and 7.1 +/- 5.9 min(-1) in N and H, respectively (p = 0.81). Conclusion The immediate BRS decrease in H, coupled with similar rapid HR and CO responses, is compatible with a withdrawal of residual vagal activity in H associated with increased sympathetic drive.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
[2024] Taboni et al.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: PUBBLICO - Creative Commons 4.0
Dimensione 1.35 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.35 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/596785
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact