This paper proposes a stylized two-region model to study the joint effect of waste mobility and WtE plant’s ownership on waste disposal choices, welfare and environmental quality. The aggregate level of recycling emerging from the mobility/private ownership scenario is excessive relative to the first best. By contrast, under waste autarky, the institutional configuration of the WtE plant turns out to be neutral and the resulting level of recycling is generally suboptimal. The analysis further shows that mobility may not be Pareto improving for both regions, and that the engagement of local authorities in the decision of how much waste to incinerate has a sound economic justification, especially in the presence of old-generation WtE plants. Finally, this work provides new insights into the debate about the relationship between WtE incineration and recycling by suggesting that the two opposing views within such debate are not totally incompatible; rather they capture different dimensions of the problem. In particular, the view that WtE combustion represents an obstacle to recycling is consistent with what is found at the local level when burning waste for energy recovery becomes available. while the view that the two activities are positively correlated is more in line with the findings at the aggregate level.

Waste-to-Energy and recycling: The role of plant ownership and waste mobility

Levaggi, Rosella;Marchiori, Carmen
;
Trecroci, Carmine
2022-01-01

Abstract

This paper proposes a stylized two-region model to study the joint effect of waste mobility and WtE plant’s ownership on waste disposal choices, welfare and environmental quality. The aggregate level of recycling emerging from the mobility/private ownership scenario is excessive relative to the first best. By contrast, under waste autarky, the institutional configuration of the WtE plant turns out to be neutral and the resulting level of recycling is generally suboptimal. The analysis further shows that mobility may not be Pareto improving for both regions, and that the engagement of local authorities in the decision of how much waste to incinerate has a sound economic justification, especially in the presence of old-generation WtE plants. Finally, this work provides new insights into the debate about the relationship between WtE incineration and recycling by suggesting that the two opposing views within such debate are not totally incompatible; rather they capture different dimensions of the problem. In particular, the view that WtE combustion represents an obstacle to recycling is consistent with what is found at the local level when burning waste for energy recovery becomes available. while the view that the two activities are positively correlated is more in line with the findings at the aggregate level.
2022
2022
SH1_11 Public economics, political economics, public administration
SH1_3 Microeconomics, institutional economics
SH3_1 Environment, resources and sustainability
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
Internazionale
141
35
51
17
WtE technologyRecyclingWaste mobilityWelfare
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X22000216?via=ihub
no
Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities
4
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Levaggi, Laura; Levaggi, Rosella; Marchiori, Carmen; Trecroci, Carmine
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/552095
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact