Two ingredients seem essential in understanding the patient–physician relationship: (i) the physician’s informational advantage and (ii) the relevance of the patient’s emotions. Health economics has placed great emphasis on the first phenomenon, whereas the second has been considered only recently, that is with the growth of fields of analysis such as Economics and Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, and few investigations have been undertaken. In this article, we survey and discuss the important changes of perspective which the theory that studies the patient–physician relationship has undergone over time.We focus, in particular,on the attitude of patients towards health information and on the role of patient information in physician agency.

Emotions in Physician Agency

LEVAGGI, Rosella;
2008-01-01

Abstract

Two ingredients seem essential in understanding the patient–physician relationship: (i) the physician’s informational advantage and (ii) the relevance of the patient’s emotions. Health economics has placed great emphasis on the first phenomenon, whereas the second has been considered only recently, that is with the growth of fields of analysis such as Economics and Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, and few investigations have been undertaken. In this article, we survey and discuss the important changes of perspective which the theory that studies the patient–physician relationship has undergone over time.We focus, in particular,on the attitude of patients towards health information and on the role of patient information in physician agency.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
health_policy_2008.pdf

gestori archivio

Tipologia: Full Text
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 159.76 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
159.76 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/18650
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact