Background: Accurate recognition of consciousness level and detection of neurological complications since the intensive care unit are crucial for an appropriate prognostication and tailored treatment in patients with post-anoxic disorder of consciousness (DoC). Objective: The present inter-society Consensus Conference aimed at addressing current debates on diagnostic and prognostic procedures. Methods: Twelve working groups involving 22 multidisciplinary professionals (membership of 9 Scientific Societies and 2 patients’ family Associations) conducted a systematic literature review focused on 12 questions addressing diagnosis (n = 5) and prognosis (n = 7). The quality of evidence of the included studies was evaluated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. A Jury involving Scientific Societies and patients’ family Associations provided recommendations based on the evidence levels and expert opinion. Results: An overall number of 1,219 papers was screened, and 21 were included in the review. Working groups produced a report on strengths and limits of evidence for each question. The overall suggestion was to use a multimodal assessment combining validated clinical scales, neurophysiological exams, and neuroimaging in diagnostic and prognostic procedure, to guide personalized treatment. A strong recommendation was to use standardized terminologies and diagnostic criteria for ensuring homogeneity and appropriateness in patients management. Conclusion: This multidisciplinary Consensus Conference provided the first operational recommendations for a good clinical practice procedure for patients with post-anoxic DoC. A periodic review will be necessary based on future evidence from the literature and implementation of the present recommendations.
Care pathways for individuals with post-anoxic disorder of consciousness (CaPIADoC): an inter-society Consensus Conference
Robba C.;Marino S.;Leonardi M.;Latronico N.;
2025-01-01
Abstract
Background: Accurate recognition of consciousness level and detection of neurological complications since the intensive care unit are crucial for an appropriate prognostication and tailored treatment in patients with post-anoxic disorder of consciousness (DoC). Objective: The present inter-society Consensus Conference aimed at addressing current debates on diagnostic and prognostic procedures. Methods: Twelve working groups involving 22 multidisciplinary professionals (membership of 9 Scientific Societies and 2 patients’ family Associations) conducted a systematic literature review focused on 12 questions addressing diagnosis (n = 5) and prognosis (n = 7). The quality of evidence of the included studies was evaluated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. A Jury involving Scientific Societies and patients’ family Associations provided recommendations based on the evidence levels and expert opinion. Results: An overall number of 1,219 papers was screened, and 21 were included in the review. Working groups produced a report on strengths and limits of evidence for each question. The overall suggestion was to use a multimodal assessment combining validated clinical scales, neurophysiological exams, and neuroimaging in diagnostic and prognostic procedure, to guide personalized treatment. A strong recommendation was to use standardized terminologies and diagnostic criteria for ensuring homogeneity and appropriateness in patients management. Conclusion: This multidisciplinary Consensus Conference provided the first operational recommendations for a good clinical practice procedure for patients with post-anoxic DoC. A periodic review will be necessary based on future evidence from the literature and implementation of the present recommendations.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
NeurolSci24 Brain Anoxia_Cardiac Arrest Care pathways CaPIADoC-Inter‑Society Consensus Conference.pdf
gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Full Text
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.01 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.01 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


