Objective: To evaluate predictors of ideal postoperative trajectories after minimally invasive left pancreatectomy (MILP). Summary background data: Postoperative course after MILP can be assessed through the Ideal Outcome (IO), but no predictive tool is currently available. Methods: MILP performed between 2010-2022 across 55 French centers were included. 90-days IO required absence of mortality, severe complications, postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (CR-POPF), reoperation, readmission, and length of stay (LOS)≤75th percentile; Best Performer (BP) was IO with LOS≤25thp. Predictors were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). Model performance was assessed with nested cross-validation and 1,000-iteration bootstrap resampling. Results: Among 2,092 MILP, mortality was 1.3%, reoperation 5.6%, severe morbidity 17.9%, CR-POPF 18.8%, and readmission 15.3%; median LOS 9 days [IQR 7-13]. IO and BP occurred in 59.6% and 28.1%. Following a stepwise strategy, starting with a preoperative multivariable logistic regression model (AUC 0.57), then a preoperative-only XGBoost model (AUC 0.59), improved by inclusion of intraoperative variables (AUC 0.62); finally, after refining the endpoint to Best Performer (IO+LOS ≤25th percentile), the final XGBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.72 (95%CI 0.70-0.74). SHAP analysis identified center-volume and operative duration as the strongest contributors, followed by age, BMI, conversion, blood loss, and splenectomy. At the optimal threshold, sensitivity reached 0.78, specificity 0.57, PPV 0.41, and NPV 0.87. An online risk calculator is at disposal. Conclusions: Predicting ideal postoperative trajectory after MILP remains challenging; identifying determinants may help optimize postoperative pathways by integrating preoperative and intraoperative determinants of recovery.

Predicting Best Performers After Minimally Invasive Left Pancreatectomy

Piardi, Tullio;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate predictors of ideal postoperative trajectories after minimally invasive left pancreatectomy (MILP). Summary background data: Postoperative course after MILP can be assessed through the Ideal Outcome (IO), but no predictive tool is currently available. Methods: MILP performed between 2010-2022 across 55 French centers were included. 90-days IO required absence of mortality, severe complications, postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (CR-POPF), reoperation, readmission, and length of stay (LOS)≤75th percentile; Best Performer (BP) was IO with LOS≤25thp. Predictors were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). Model performance was assessed with nested cross-validation and 1,000-iteration bootstrap resampling. Results: Among 2,092 MILP, mortality was 1.3%, reoperation 5.6%, severe morbidity 17.9%, CR-POPF 18.8%, and readmission 15.3%; median LOS 9 days [IQR 7-13]. IO and BP occurred in 59.6% and 28.1%. Following a stepwise strategy, starting with a preoperative multivariable logistic regression model (AUC 0.57), then a preoperative-only XGBoost model (AUC 0.59), improved by inclusion of intraoperative variables (AUC 0.62); finally, after refining the endpoint to Best Performer (IO+LOS ≤25th percentile), the final XGBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.72 (95%CI 0.70-0.74). SHAP analysis identified center-volume and operative duration as the strongest contributors, followed by age, BMI, conversion, blood loss, and splenectomy. At the optimal threshold, sensitivity reached 0.78, specificity 0.57, PPV 0.41, and NPV 0.87. An online risk calculator is at disposal. Conclusions: Predicting ideal postoperative trajectory after MILP remains challenging; identifying determinants may help optimize postoperative pathways by integrating preoperative and intraoperative determinants of recovery.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/647071
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact