Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
IRIS Institutional Research Information System - OPENBS Open Archive UniBS
Objective: To evaluate predictors of ideal postoperative trajectories after minimally invasive left pancreatectomy (MILP). Summary background data: Postoperative course after MILP can be assessed through the Ideal Outcome (IO), but no predictive tool is currently available. Methods: MILP performed between 2010-2022 across 55 French centers were included. 90-days IO required absence of mortality, severe complications, postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (CR-POPF), reoperation, readmission, and length of stay (LOS)≤75th percentile; Best Performer (BP) was IO with LOS≤25thp. Predictors were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). Model performance was assessed with nested cross-validation and 1,000-iteration bootstrap resampling. Results: Among 2,092 MILP, mortality was 1.3%, reoperation 5.6%, severe morbidity 17.9%, CR-POPF 18.8%, and readmission 15.3%; median LOS 9 days [IQR 7-13]. IO and BP occurred in 59.6% and 28.1%. Following a stepwise strategy, starting with a preoperative multivariable logistic regression model (AUC 0.57), then a preoperative-only XGBoost model (AUC 0.59), improved by inclusion of intraoperative variables (AUC 0.62); finally, after refining the endpoint to Best Performer (IO+LOS ≤25th percentile), the final XGBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.72 (95%CI 0.70-0.74). SHAP analysis identified center-volume and operative duration as the strongest contributors, followed by age, BMI, conversion, blood loss, and splenectomy. At the optimal threshold, sensitivity reached 0.78, specificity 0.57, PPV 0.41, and NPV 0.87. An online risk calculator is at disposal. Conclusions: Predicting ideal postoperative trajectory after MILP remains challenging; identifying determinants may help optimize postoperative pathways by integrating preoperative and intraoperative determinants of recovery.
Predicting Best Performers After Minimally Invasive Left Pancreatectomy
Objective: To evaluate predictors of ideal postoperative trajectories after minimally invasive left pancreatectomy (MILP). Summary background data: Postoperative course after MILP can be assessed through the Ideal Outcome (IO), but no predictive tool is currently available. Methods: MILP performed between 2010-2022 across 55 French centers were included. 90-days IO required absence of mortality, severe complications, postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (CR-POPF), reoperation, readmission, and length of stay (LOS)≤75th percentile; Best Performer (BP) was IO with LOS≤25thp. Predictors were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). Model performance was assessed with nested cross-validation and 1,000-iteration bootstrap resampling. Results: Among 2,092 MILP, mortality was 1.3%, reoperation 5.6%, severe morbidity 17.9%, CR-POPF 18.8%, and readmission 15.3%; median LOS 9 days [IQR 7-13]. IO and BP occurred in 59.6% and 28.1%. Following a stepwise strategy, starting with a preoperative multivariable logistic regression model (AUC 0.57), then a preoperative-only XGBoost model (AUC 0.59), improved by inclusion of intraoperative variables (AUC 0.62); finally, after refining the endpoint to Best Performer (IO+LOS ≤25th percentile), the final XGBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.72 (95%CI 0.70-0.74). SHAP analysis identified center-volume and operative duration as the strongest contributors, followed by age, BMI, conversion, blood loss, and splenectomy. At the optimal threshold, sensitivity reached 0.78, specificity 0.57, PPV 0.41, and NPV 0.87. An online risk calculator is at disposal. Conclusions: Predicting ideal postoperative trajectory after MILP remains challenging; identifying determinants may help optimize postoperative pathways by integrating preoperative and intraoperative determinants of recovery.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/647071
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
ND
ND
ND
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.