Purpose: We employed an optimization method for the approximate entropy (ApEn) parameters (m, r) to evaluate the influence of changes in contraction intensity, visual feedback conditions, and joint angles in force ApEn during an isometric force-matching task. Methods: Seventeen participants performed an index finger abduction isometric force task in six contraction intensities (5–75% of maximum voluntary contraction, MVC), with and without visual feedback of the force, and in three different metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint angles. Force variability, complexity (ApEn), and power spectrum density (PSD) were assessed, and a correlation analysis was performed between these variables. Results: The best ApEn (m, r) pair for muscle force analysis was m=2 and r=0.20× force standard deviation (SD). Visual feedback influenced the ApEn; however, the comparison between experimental conditions (force intensity and joint angle) was similar. Both the force ApEn and the coefficient of variation (CoV) were reduced as a function of contraction intensity and without visual feedback. Conversely, the force SD and the PSD in the low-frequency band increased with contraction intensity and the absence of visual feedback. The changes in the MCP joint angle affected the MVC values and force CoV, with no significant effect on the force ApEn. The PSD in the low-frequency band (< 5 Hz) showed a strong negative correlation with force ApEn in both visual feedback conditions. Conclusion: ApEn is influenced by force level and visual feedback, and it is strongly correlated with low-frequency force oscillations, which are related to the muscle’s common drive.
Reassessment of isometric muscle force complexity under different contraction intensities, joint angles, and visual feedback conditions
Negro F.;
2025-01-01
Abstract
Purpose: We employed an optimization method for the approximate entropy (ApEn) parameters (m, r) to evaluate the influence of changes in contraction intensity, visual feedback conditions, and joint angles in force ApEn during an isometric force-matching task. Methods: Seventeen participants performed an index finger abduction isometric force task in six contraction intensities (5–75% of maximum voluntary contraction, MVC), with and without visual feedback of the force, and in three different metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint angles. Force variability, complexity (ApEn), and power spectrum density (PSD) were assessed, and a correlation analysis was performed between these variables. Results: The best ApEn (m, r) pair for muscle force analysis was m=2 and r=0.20× force standard deviation (SD). Visual feedback influenced the ApEn; however, the comparison between experimental conditions (force intensity and joint angle) was similar. Both the force ApEn and the coefficient of variation (CoV) were reduced as a function of contraction intensity and without visual feedback. Conversely, the force SD and the PSD in the low-frequency band increased with contraction intensity and the absence of visual feedback. The changes in the MCP joint angle affected the MVC values and force CoV, with no significant effect on the force ApEn. The PSD in the low-frequency band (< 5 Hz) showed a strong negative correlation with force ApEn in both visual feedback conditions. Conclusion: ApEn is influenced by force level and visual feedback, and it is strongly correlated with low-frequency force oscillations, which are related to the muscle’s common drive.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
