Background: Contralateral lymph node metastasis (CLNM) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) represents a major clinical challenge, in patients with a clinically contralateral node-negative neck. Individualized risk stratification is crucial to guide decisions on elective contralateral neck dissection. This study aimed to synthesize existing evidence and apply Bayesian Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) to estimate CLNM probability across various clinic-pathological scenarios. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, PubMed Central, and Embase (2000–2024) identified 26 eligible studies. Effect sizes for seven key risk factors—midline-crossing tumours, extranodal extension (ENE), ≥2 ipsilateral lymph nodes, depth of invasion (DOI) >10 mm, perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion (PNI-LVI), poor differentiation, and floor of mouth subsite—were computed and incorporated into a Bayesian logistic model. Using the No-U-Turn Sampler (NUTS) in RStan, 100,000 virtual patient profiles were simulated to generate posterior probabilities of CLNM. Results: The baseline CLNM risk for lateralized tumours without additional risk factors was 4.2%. Single risk factors increased probability substantially: midline-crossing tumours (31.7%), ENE (27.4%), and ≥2 ipsilateral nodes (24.9%). Combinations of risk factors amplified the risk non-linearly: the presence of a midline-crossing tumour, ENE, and ≥2 ipsilateral nodes yielded a 76.8% CLNM probability, and the presence of all seven risk factors increased it to 93.7%. Risk tiers were classified from minimal (<20%) to very high (>50%) to guide clinical decision-making. Conclusions: This MCS-based model reveals that CLNM risk increases multiplicatively with the presence of various high-risk features. The simulation supports bilateral neck management in high-risk patients and observation in low-risk cases. Prospective validation is needed to integrate this model into routine clinical practice and to guide patient-specific surgical planning.

Bayesian Monte Carlo Simulation Based on Systematic Review for Personalized Risk Stratification of Contralateral Lymph Node Metastasis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Piazza, Cesare;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background: Contralateral lymph node metastasis (CLNM) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) represents a major clinical challenge, in patients with a clinically contralateral node-negative neck. Individualized risk stratification is crucial to guide decisions on elective contralateral neck dissection. This study aimed to synthesize existing evidence and apply Bayesian Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) to estimate CLNM probability across various clinic-pathological scenarios. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, PubMed Central, and Embase (2000–2024) identified 26 eligible studies. Effect sizes for seven key risk factors—midline-crossing tumours, extranodal extension (ENE), ≥2 ipsilateral lymph nodes, depth of invasion (DOI) >10 mm, perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion (PNI-LVI), poor differentiation, and floor of mouth subsite—were computed and incorporated into a Bayesian logistic model. Using the No-U-Turn Sampler (NUTS) in RStan, 100,000 virtual patient profiles were simulated to generate posterior probabilities of CLNM. Results: The baseline CLNM risk for lateralized tumours without additional risk factors was 4.2%. Single risk factors increased probability substantially: midline-crossing tumours (31.7%), ENE (27.4%), and ≥2 ipsilateral nodes (24.9%). Combinations of risk factors amplified the risk non-linearly: the presence of a midline-crossing tumour, ENE, and ≥2 ipsilateral nodes yielded a 76.8% CLNM probability, and the presence of all seven risk factors increased it to 93.7%. Risk tiers were classified from minimal (<20%) to very high (>50%) to guide clinical decision-making. Conclusions: This MCS-based model reveals that CLNM risk increases multiplicatively with the presence of various high-risk features. The simulation supports bilateral neck management in high-risk patients and observation in low-risk cases. Prospective validation is needed to integrate this model into routine clinical practice and to guide patient-specific surgical planning.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
diagnostics-15-02668-v2.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Full Text
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 1.54 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.54 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/634847
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact