Background: Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) comprise more than 500 different rare congenital disorders of the immune system and are characterized by susceptibility to infection and immune dysregulation. The significant overlap of the clinical features among the different forms may lead to diagnostic delay. High-throughput sequencing techniques may allow a timely genetic definition. Guidelines for the use and the interpretation of genetic testing produced by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) do not cover specifics for their application to IEIs. Objective: The aim of this consensus study was to define the best approach to genetic testing for IEIs. Methods: A panel of experts in the context of the Italian Primary Immunodeficiency Network (IPINet) composed a list of statements that were evaluated by the Delphi method. Results: The experts recommend that genetic testing for IEIs should be offered to selected patients with warning signs for IEIs and highlight the crucial role of thorough phenotyping and functional tests for the conclusive diagnosis of IEI. Comprehensive educational programs targeted to health care professionals and the public should be developed to increase IEIs awareness and reduce diagnostic delay. Ethical issues should be pondered over the diagnostic advantages of genetic tests requested for diagnostic purposes. Conclusion: Adherence to guidelines on the use and interpretation of genetic tests for diagnosing IEIs should help limit the inappropriate use of these techniques, thereby reducing the risk of misdiagnosis and patient apprehension regarding inconclusive genetic results.

Consensus of the Italian Primary Immunodeficiency Network on the use and interpretation of genetic testing for diagnosing inborn errors of immunity

Giliani, Silvia;Ferrari, Simona;Lougaris, Vassilios;Badolato, Raffaele;Moschese, Viviana;Cancrini, Caterina;Aiuti, Alessandro;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Background: Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) comprise more than 500 different rare congenital disorders of the immune system and are characterized by susceptibility to infection and immune dysregulation. The significant overlap of the clinical features among the different forms may lead to diagnostic delay. High-throughput sequencing techniques may allow a timely genetic definition. Guidelines for the use and the interpretation of genetic testing produced by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) do not cover specifics for their application to IEIs. Objective: The aim of this consensus study was to define the best approach to genetic testing for IEIs. Methods: A panel of experts in the context of the Italian Primary Immunodeficiency Network (IPINet) composed a list of statements that were evaluated by the Delphi method. Results: The experts recommend that genetic testing for IEIs should be offered to selected patients with warning signs for IEIs and highlight the crucial role of thorough phenotyping and functional tests for the conclusive diagnosis of IEI. Comprehensive educational programs targeted to health care professionals and the public should be developed to increase IEIs awareness and reduce diagnostic delay. Ethical issues should be pondered over the diagnostic advantages of genetic tests requested for diagnostic purposes. Conclusion: Adherence to guidelines on the use and interpretation of genetic tests for diagnosing IEIs should help limit the inappropriate use of these techniques, thereby reducing the risk of misdiagnosis and patient apprehension regarding inconclusive genetic results.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/622607
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact