The debate on the argumentative turn in Public Policy and Administration (PPA), as reflective of the influence of political-legal theory on the discipline, is reviewed with a thorough and indepth engagement with the Argumentation Theory (AT) literature. The focus in this article is in fact of a methodological nature, since we argue that critical scholars - who have contributed to the general and specialized (i.e. political discourse analysis and critical contextualism) literature of AT as well as politico-legal theory - pave way to a novel methodology which will be exemplifed through the analysis of the transparency concept.
Transparency in Internet Regulation and Governance: Arguments and Counter-Arguments with some Methodological Reflections
Natalina, Stamile
;
2018-01-01
Abstract
The debate on the argumentative turn in Public Policy and Administration (PPA), as reflective of the influence of political-legal theory on the discipline, is reviewed with a thorough and indepth engagement with the Argumentation Theory (AT) literature. The focus in this article is in fact of a methodological nature, since we argue that critical scholars - who have contributed to the general and specialized (i.e. political discourse analysis and critical contextualism) literature of AT as well as politico-legal theory - pave way to a novel methodology which will be exemplifed through the analysis of the transparency concept.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
624-Texto do Artigo-1923-1-10-20190115.pdf
gestori archivio
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
674.15 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
674.15 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.