Monitoring the richness and the diversity of species living in an ecosystem is an important goal of ecology. To this purpose, measures of biodiversity have been introduced as statistical summaries of the abundance vector. In particular, we take into consideration the Gini-Simpson and the Shannon-Wiener indices, along with the effective number of species calculated through these measures, proposed, respectively, by Laakso and Taa-gepera (Comp Polit Stud 12:3-25, 1979) and Leti (Statistica descrittiva, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1983). It is an open question how to associate to these indices a measure of uncertainty. In this paper we compare confidence intervals based on these measures, calculated through three different bootstrap methods: percentile, -t and accelerated bias-corrected percentile. We recommend to practitioners to use the percentile procedure, as it is straightforward and computationally feasible, providing results very close to those obtained by more complex techniques.

Bootstrap confidence intervals for biodiversity measures based on Gini index and entropy

Ripamonti E.
2017-01-01

Abstract

Monitoring the richness and the diversity of species living in an ecosystem is an important goal of ecology. To this purpose, measures of biodiversity have been introduced as statistical summaries of the abundance vector. In particular, we take into consideration the Gini-Simpson and the Shannon-Wiener indices, along with the effective number of species calculated through these measures, proposed, respectively, by Laakso and Taa-gepera (Comp Polit Stud 12:3-25, 1979) and Leti (Statistica descrittiva, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1983). It is an open question how to associate to these indices a measure of uncertainty. In this paper we compare confidence intervals based on these measures, calculated through three different bootstrap methods: percentile, -t and accelerated bias-corrected percentile. We recommend to practitioners to use the percentile procedure, as it is straightforward and computationally feasible, providing results very close to those obtained by more complex techniques.
2017
Inglese
51
2
847
858
12
Gini-Simpson index; Shannon-Wiener index; Leti index; Laakso-Taagepera index; Bootstrap methods; Confidence intervals
no
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
3
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Pesenti, N.; Quatto, P.; Ripamonti, E.
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/594065
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact