Liquid biopsy research on Low-Grade gliomas (LGG) has remained less conspicuous than that on other malignant brain tumors. Reliable serum markers would be precious for diagnosis, follow- up and treatment. We propose a clinical utility score (CUS) for biomarkers in LGG that mirrors their clinical usefulness. We conducted a PRISMA review. We examined each biomarker classifying them by CUS and Level of Evidence (LOE). We identified four classes of biomarkers: (1). Circulating protein—(a) vitronectin discriminates LGG from HGG (Sn:98%, Sp:91%, CUS: 3, LOE: III), (b) CTLA-4 discriminates LGG from HGG, (cutoff: 220.43 pg/ml, Sn: 82%, Sp: 78%, CUS:3, LOE:III), (c) pre-operative TGF b1 predict astrocytoma (cutoff: 2.52 ng/ml, Sn: 94.9%, Sp: 100%, CUS:3, LOE:VI). (2). micro-RNA (miR)—(a) miR-16 discriminates between WHO IV and WHO II and III groups (AUC = 0.98, CUS:3, LOE: III), (b) miR-454-3p is higher in HGG than in LGG (p = 0.013, CUS:3, LOE: III), (c) miR-210 expression is related to WHO grades (Sn 83.2%, Sp 94.3%, CUS: 3, LOE: III). (3). Circulating DNA—(a) IDH1R132H mutation detected in plasma by combined COLD and digital PCR (Sn: 60%, Sp: 100%, CUS: 3, LOE: III). 4. Exosomes—(a) SDC1 serum levels could discriminate GBM from LGG (Sn: 71%, Sp: 91%, CUS: 2C, LOE: VI). Our investigation showed that miRs appear to have the highest clinical utility. The LOE of the studies assessed is generally low. A combined approach between different biomarkers and traditional diagnostics may be considered. Graphical Abstract: We identified four main classes of biomarkers produced by LGG. We examined each biomarker, classifying them by clinical utility score (CUS) and level of evidence (LOE). Micro-RNA (miRs) appears to have the highest CUS and LOE. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Liquid Biopsy in Low-Grade Glioma: A Systematic Review and a Proposal for a Clinical Utility Score

Zanin L.;Panciani P. P.;Fontanella M. M.;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Liquid biopsy research on Low-Grade gliomas (LGG) has remained less conspicuous than that on other malignant brain tumors. Reliable serum markers would be precious for diagnosis, follow- up and treatment. We propose a clinical utility score (CUS) for biomarkers in LGG that mirrors their clinical usefulness. We conducted a PRISMA review. We examined each biomarker classifying them by CUS and Level of Evidence (LOE). We identified four classes of biomarkers: (1). Circulating protein—(a) vitronectin discriminates LGG from HGG (Sn:98%, Sp:91%, CUS: 3, LOE: III), (b) CTLA-4 discriminates LGG from HGG, (cutoff: 220.43 pg/ml, Sn: 82%, Sp: 78%, CUS:3, LOE:III), (c) pre-operative TGF b1 predict astrocytoma (cutoff: 2.52 ng/ml, Sn: 94.9%, Sp: 100%, CUS:3, LOE:VI). (2). micro-RNA (miR)—(a) miR-16 discriminates between WHO IV and WHO II and III groups (AUC = 0.98, CUS:3, LOE: III), (b) miR-454-3p is higher in HGG than in LGG (p = 0.013, CUS:3, LOE: III), (c) miR-210 expression is related to WHO grades (Sn 83.2%, Sp 94.3%, CUS: 3, LOE: III). (3). Circulating DNA—(a) IDH1R132H mutation detected in plasma by combined COLD and digital PCR (Sn: 60%, Sp: 100%, CUS: 3, LOE: III). 4. Exosomes—(a) SDC1 serum levels could discriminate GBM from LGG (Sn: 71%, Sp: 91%, CUS: 2C, LOE: VI). Our investigation showed that miRs appear to have the highest clinical utility. The LOE of the studies assessed is generally low. A combined approach between different biomarkers and traditional diagnostics may be considered. Graphical Abstract: We identified four main classes of biomarkers produced by LGG. We examined each biomarker, classifying them by clinical utility score (CUS) and level of evidence (LOE). Micro-RNA (miRs) appears to have the highest CUS and LOE. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/587206
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact