Objective: To report early and midterm results registry of patients undergoing repeated aortic valve replacement (RAVR) with sutureless prostheses from an international prospective registry (SURE-AVR). Methods: Between March 2011 and June 2019, 69 patients underwent RAVR with self-expandable sutureless aortic bioprostheses at 22 international cardiac centers.Results: Overall mortality was 2.9% with a predicted logistic EuroSCORE 11 of 10.7%. Indications for RAVR were structural valve dysfunction (84.1%) and infective prosthetic endocarditis (15.9%) and were performed in patients with previously implanted bioprostheses (79.7%), mechanical valves (15.9%), and transcatheter valves (4.3%). Minimally invasive approach was performed in 15.9% of patients. Rate of stroke was 1.4% and rate of early valve-related reintervention was 1.4%. Overall survival rate at 1 and 5 years was 97% and 91%, respectively. No major paravalvular leak occurred. Rate of pacemaker implantation was 5.8% and 0.9% per patient-year early and at follow-up, respectively. The mean transvalvular gradient at 1-year and 5-year follow-up was 10.5 mmHg and 11.5 mmHg with a median effective orifice area of 1.8 cm 2 and 1.8 cm 2 , respectively. Conclusions: RAVR with sutureless valves is a safe and effective approach and provides excellent clinical and hemodynamic results up to 5 years.

Sutureless Valve in Repeated Aortic Valve Replacement: Results from an International Prospective Registry

Di Bacco L.;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Objective: To report early and midterm results registry of patients undergoing repeated aortic valve replacement (RAVR) with sutureless prostheses from an international prospective registry (SURE-AVR). Methods: Between March 2011 and June 2019, 69 patients underwent RAVR with self-expandable sutureless aortic bioprostheses at 22 international cardiac centers.Results: Overall mortality was 2.9% with a predicted logistic EuroSCORE 11 of 10.7%. Indications for RAVR were structural valve dysfunction (84.1%) and infective prosthetic endocarditis (15.9%) and were performed in patients with previously implanted bioprostheses (79.7%), mechanical valves (15.9%), and transcatheter valves (4.3%). Minimally invasive approach was performed in 15.9% of patients. Rate of stroke was 1.4% and rate of early valve-related reintervention was 1.4%. Overall survival rate at 1 and 5 years was 97% and 91%, respectively. No major paravalvular leak occurred. Rate of pacemaker implantation was 5.8% and 0.9% per patient-year early and at follow-up, respectively. The mean transvalvular gradient at 1-year and 5-year follow-up was 10.5 mmHg and 11.5 mmHg with a median effective orifice area of 1.8 cm 2 and 1.8 cm 2 , respectively. Conclusions: RAVR with sutureless valves is a safe and effective approach and provides excellent clinical and hemodynamic results up to 5 years.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
glauber-et-al-2021-sutureless-valve-in-repeated-aortic-valve-replacement-results-from-an-international-prospective.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Sutureless Valve in Repeated Aortic Valve Replacement: Results from an International Prospective Registry
Tipologia: Full Text
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 200.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
200.31 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/577672
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact