Purpose – This paper aims to understand stakeholders’ sentiments with respect to company policies in the water utilities (WU) sector and to explore if and how these sentiments could be a source for organisational learning. Design/methodology/approach – This study investigates the use of social media in WUs’ and stakeholders’ reactions as a source of data for organisational learning. This paper relies on a mixed-methods approach based on sentiment analysis of Facebook (FB) pages and semi-structured interviews with sustainability managers from a sample of Italian WUs. Findings – Findings show thatWUs increasingly use FB mainly to promote and disclose environmental issues and as a source of information for organisational learning. A longitudinal analysis of environmental disclosure via FB reveals a growing trend of both companies’ posts and stakeholder interactions and significant differences among organisations in theirways of using information and knowledge obtained from social media. Originality/value – Theoretically, this paper builds an original link between disclosure via social media and organisational learning processes. Empirically, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first studies this is one of the first studies to identify the quantity and quality of environmental disclosure via FB and the related stakeholders’ reactions.

Stakeholder interactions as sources for organisational learning: insights from the water sector

Davide Giacomini
;
Diego Paredi;Alessandro Sancino
2022-01-01

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to understand stakeholders’ sentiments with respect to company policies in the water utilities (WU) sector and to explore if and how these sentiments could be a source for organisational learning. Design/methodology/approach – This study investigates the use of social media in WUs’ and stakeholders’ reactions as a source of data for organisational learning. This paper relies on a mixed-methods approach based on sentiment analysis of Facebook (FB) pages and semi-structured interviews with sustainability managers from a sample of Italian WUs. Findings – Findings show thatWUs increasingly use FB mainly to promote and disclose environmental issues and as a source of information for organisational learning. A longitudinal analysis of environmental disclosure via FB reveals a growing trend of both companies’ posts and stakeholder interactions and significant differences among organisations in theirways of using information and knowledge obtained from social media. Originality/value – Theoretically, this paper builds an original link between disclosure via social media and organisational learning processes. Empirically, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first studies this is one of the first studies to identify the quantity and quality of environmental disclosure via FB and the related stakeholders’ reactions.
2022
2022
Ateneo di appartenenza
SH1_9 Organization studies, strategy
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
Internazionale
ELETTRONICO
30
7
1
25
25
Organisational learning, Organisational legitimacy, Environmental disclosure, Sustainability, Corporate social responsibility, Social media
Imprese italiane
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MEDAR-11-2020-1066/full/html
Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation
Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production
Goal 15: Life on land
3
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Giacomini, Davide; Paredi, Diego; Sancino, Alessandro
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
restricted
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Stakeholder interactions as sources for organisational learning.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: File paper
Tipologia: Full Text
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 671.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
671.21 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/556638
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact