The importance of soil biodiversity and soil-based ecosystem services in the context of viticulture has recently been emphasized. Over 85% of soil fauna species richness is represented by edaphic arthropod communities. Edaphic arthropod responses to soil characteristics and management practices can be considered as good bioindicators of soil quality. Here, 168 soil samples that were collected from 2014 to 2019 in several vineyards of different Italian wine-growing areas were analyzed to explore how arthropod communities respond to several factors that are characteristic of vineyard ecosystems. The analysis of the combined effects of the primary abiotic variables (the chemical and physical characteristics of soil) and management practices (organic vs. conventional, soil inter-row management) on soil biological quality (assessed by QBS-ar index) identified soil temperature and soil texture as the abiotic factors exerting the most significant effect on the QBS-ar values. Organic vineyards exhibited higher QBS-ar values compared to those of conventionally managed vineyards, and subsoiling negatively influenced the soil biological quality.

Impact of Environmental Conditions and Management on Soil Arthropod Communities in Vineyard Ecosystems

Ghiglieno, Isabella;Simonetto, Anna
;
Sperandio, Giorgio;Ventura, Matteo;Gatti, Fabio;Tonni, Marco;Valenti, Leonardo;Gilioli, Gianni
2021-01-01

Abstract

The importance of soil biodiversity and soil-based ecosystem services in the context of viticulture has recently been emphasized. Over 85% of soil fauna species richness is represented by edaphic arthropod communities. Edaphic arthropod responses to soil characteristics and management practices can be considered as good bioindicators of soil quality. Here, 168 soil samples that were collected from 2014 to 2019 in several vineyards of different Italian wine-growing areas were analyzed to explore how arthropod communities respond to several factors that are characteristic of vineyard ecosystems. The analysis of the combined effects of the primary abiotic variables (the chemical and physical characteristics of soil) and management practices (organic vs. conventional, soil inter-row management) on soil biological quality (assessed by QBS-ar index) identified soil temperature and soil texture as the abiotic factors exerting the most significant effect on the QBS-ar values. Organic vineyards exhibited higher QBS-ar values compared to those of conventionally managed vineyards, and subsoiling negatively influenced the soil biological quality.
2021
2021
Ateneo di appartenenza
LS8_2 Population biology, population dynamics, population genetics, plant-animal interactions
LS8_4 Biodiversity, comparative biology
LS8_1 Ecology (theoretical, community, population, microbial, evolutionary ecology)
LS9_5 Agriculture related to crop production, soil biology and cultivation, applied plant biology
SH3_1 Environment, resources and sustainability
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
Internazionale
ELETTRONICO
13
21
11999
12
soil biological quality; vineyard; organic management; soil temperature; soil texture; subsoiling
no
Goal 2: Zero hunger
Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production
Goal 15: Life on land
9
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Ghiglieno, Isabella; Simonetto, Anna; Sperandio, Giorgio; Ventura, Matteo; Gatti, Fabio; Donna, Pierluigi; Tonni, Marco; Valenti, Leonardo; Gilioli, G...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
open
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2021 - Sustainability - Ghiglieno - Impact of Environmental Conditions and Management on Soil Arthropod Communities in Vineyard Ecosystems.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Full Text
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 940.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
940.4 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/548859
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact