Objectives: To evaluate, in pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), the predictive role of uterine artery (UtA) Doppler for pregnancy outcome compared to the definition of preeclampsia (PE) established by ISSHP recommendations. Study design: Retrospective cohort study including singleton pregnancies diagnosed with HDP, who underwent UtA Doppler assessment at admission in 2011–2017. The study population was classified considering the presence or absence of PE and according to the presence or absence of abnormal UtA Doppler (mean pulsatility index > 95th percentile). Main outcome measures: Pregnancy outcome, maternal and fetal complications, evaluated as composite outcomes (CO), and duration of pregnancy (from admission to delivery). Results: A total of 311 mother-infant couples was included. The diagnostic ability of the two classifications was analysed comparing the relative likelihood ratio in the Biggerstaff graph. ISSHP definition turned out to be more efficient in detecting maternal adverse CO in comparison to UtA Doppler, relative positive likelihood ratio 1.50 (1.35–1.66) and 1.31 (1.07–1.60). UtA Doppler classification resulted more efficient in predicting adverse neonatal CO than PE definition, relative positive likelihood ratio 2.21 (1.77–2.75) and 1.61 (1.37–1.90). UtA Doppler was significantly associated with delivery at earlier gestational ages both for patients affected by PE and for women affected by HDP without superimposed PE (respectively p = 0.009 and p = 0.037). Conclusions: UtA Doppler at HDP diagnosis is a useful bedside marker of fetal/neonatal complications, and is associated with pregnancy duration.

Uterine artery Doppler for the prediction of outcome in pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

Loardi C.;Fratelli N.;Mazzoni G.;Orabona R.;Valcamonico A.;Fichera A.;Sartori E.;Prefumo F.
2021-01-01

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate, in pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), the predictive role of uterine artery (UtA) Doppler for pregnancy outcome compared to the definition of preeclampsia (PE) established by ISSHP recommendations. Study design: Retrospective cohort study including singleton pregnancies diagnosed with HDP, who underwent UtA Doppler assessment at admission in 2011–2017. The study population was classified considering the presence or absence of PE and according to the presence or absence of abnormal UtA Doppler (mean pulsatility index > 95th percentile). Main outcome measures: Pregnancy outcome, maternal and fetal complications, evaluated as composite outcomes (CO), and duration of pregnancy (from admission to delivery). Results: A total of 311 mother-infant couples was included. The diagnostic ability of the two classifications was analysed comparing the relative likelihood ratio in the Biggerstaff graph. ISSHP definition turned out to be more efficient in detecting maternal adverse CO in comparison to UtA Doppler, relative positive likelihood ratio 1.50 (1.35–1.66) and 1.31 (1.07–1.60). UtA Doppler classification resulted more efficient in predicting adverse neonatal CO than PE definition, relative positive likelihood ratio 2.21 (1.77–2.75) and 1.61 (1.37–1.90). UtA Doppler was significantly associated with delivery at earlier gestational ages both for patients affected by PE and for women affected by HDP without superimposed PE (respectively p = 0.009 and p = 0.037). Conclusions: UtA Doppler at HDP diagnosis is a useful bedside marker of fetal/neonatal complications, and is associated with pregnancy duration.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Uterines Pregnancy Hypertension.pdf

gestori archivio

Tipologia: Full Text
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 694.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
694.04 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/547479
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact