A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance was conducted to compare the results of relevant studies reporting diagnostic accuracy values for mediastinal staging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This paper deals with the two most accurate imaging techniques currently in use: positron emission tomography (PET) with FDG and computed tomography (CT). A statistical pooling method was used to perform a quantitative meta-analysis aimed at demonstrating the potential advantage of one of these two methods.

Combining independent studies of diagnostic fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography and computed tomography in mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small cell lung cancer

Alongi, Filippo;
2006-01-01

Abstract

A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance was conducted to compare the results of relevant studies reporting diagnostic accuracy values for mediastinal staging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This paper deals with the two most accurate imaging techniques currently in use: positron emission tomography (PET) with FDG and computed tomography (CT). A statistical pooling method was used to perform a quantitative meta-analysis aimed at demonstrating the potential advantage of one of these two methods.
2006
Inglese
92
4
327-33
Aged; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Mediastinum; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; ROC Curve; Radiopharmaceuticals; Sensitivity and Specificity; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Positron-Emission Tomography; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Alongi, Filippo; Ragusa, Pietro; Montemaggi, Paolo; Bona, Cristina Maria
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/528660
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact