The rational control of harmful organisms for plants (pests) forms the basis of the integrated pest management (IPM), and is fundamental for ensuring agricultural productivity while maintaining economic and environmental sustainability. The high level of complexity of the decision processes linked to IPM requires careful evaluations, both economic and environmental, considering benefits and costs associated with a management action. Plant protection models and other decision tools (DTs) have assumed a key role in supporting decision-making process in pest management. The advantages of using DTs in IPM are linked to their capacity to process and analyze complex information and to provide outputs supporting the decision-making process. Nowadays, several DTs have been developed, tackling dierent issues, and have been applied in dierent climatic conditions and agricultural contexts. However, their use in crop management is restricted to only certain areas and/or to a limited group of users. In this paper, we review the current state-of-the-art related to DTs for IPM, investigate the main modelling approaches used, and the dierent fields of application. We also identify key drivers influencing their adoption and provide a set of critical success factors to guide the development and facilitate the adoption of DTs in crop protection.

Critical success factors for the adoption of decision tools in IPM

Sperandio G.;Simonetto A.;Gilioli G.
2019-01-01

Abstract

The rational control of harmful organisms for plants (pests) forms the basis of the integrated pest management (IPM), and is fundamental for ensuring agricultural productivity while maintaining economic and environmental sustainability. The high level of complexity of the decision processes linked to IPM requires careful evaluations, both economic and environmental, considering benefits and costs associated with a management action. Plant protection models and other decision tools (DTs) have assumed a key role in supporting decision-making process in pest management. The advantages of using DTs in IPM are linked to their capacity to process and analyze complex information and to provide outputs supporting the decision-making process. Nowadays, several DTs have been developed, tackling dierent issues, and have been applied in dierent climatic conditions and agricultural contexts. However, their use in crop management is restricted to only certain areas and/or to a limited group of users. In this paper, we review the current state-of-the-art related to DTs for IPM, investigate the main modelling approaches used, and the dierent fields of application. We also identify key drivers influencing their adoption and provide a set of critical success factors to guide the development and facilitate the adoption of DTs in crop protection.
2019
2019
Nessuno
LS2_10 Bioinformatics
LS8_2 Population biology, population dynamics, population genetics, plant-animal interactions
LS8_1 Ecology (theoretical, community, population, microbial, evolutionary ecology)
LS9_5 Agriculture related to crop production, soil biology and cultivation, applied plant biology
PE6_10 Web and information systems, database systems, information retrieval and digital libraries
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
Internazionale
ELETTRONICO
9
11
710
19
Crop protection; Decision support systems; Decision tools; Integrated pest management; Pest management
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/9/11/710/pdf
no
5
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Rossi, V.; Sperandio, G.; Caffi, T.; Simonetto, A.; Gilioli, G.
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
open
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2019 - Agronomy - Critical Success Factors for the Adoption of Decision Tools in IPM.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Full Text
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 493.15 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
493.15 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/526567
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 90
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 68
social impact