The paper aims to point out the inter-systemic character of judicial interpretation in contexts of legal polycentricity and interlegality, focusing on the interaction between domestic law, international fundamental rights law, and minority legal orders. Through the paradigmatic case Akther v. Khan, it shows, on the one hand, how international fundamental rights law can lead national judges to take into account minority legal orders; on the other, how this attitude of national judges can, in turn, push for the attribution of new, unexpected and sometimes controversial meanings to both national and international legal sources.
Legal Polycentricity, intergiuridicità e dimensioni “intersistemiche” dell’interpretazione giudiziale. Riflessioni a partire dal caso inglese Akhter v. Khan
parolari
2019-01-01
Abstract
The paper aims to point out the inter-systemic character of judicial interpretation in contexts of legal polycentricity and interlegality, focusing on the interaction between domestic law, international fundamental rights law, and minority legal orders. Through the paradigmatic case Akther v. Khan, it shows, on the one hand, how international fundamental rights law can lead national judges to take into account minority legal orders; on the other, how this attitude of national judges can, in turn, push for the attribution of new, unexpected and sometimes controversial meanings to both national and international legal sources.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Parolari_Legal Polycentricity, intergiuridicità e dimensioni 'intersistemiche' dell'interpretazione giudiziale_DPCE online.pdf
gestori archivio
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia:
Full Text
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
196.57 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
196.57 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.