The addition of fibers has been proven successful to simplify reinforcement in precast tunnel segments, allowing as a function of both segment typology and fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) toughness a total or partial replacement of the conventional reinforcement. Results from an experimental research aimed at comparing the structural behavior of segments made with conventional (only rebars, RC) or hybrid (rebars + fibers) reinforcement are presented. The experimental program consisted of flexural and point load tests (which reproduces the jack actions during TBM operations) carried out on four large-scale precast tunnel segments representative of a metro tunnel lining characterized by an internal diameter of 5.80 m and a thickness of 0.30 m. The main goal of the experimental program was to evaluate the possibility of using macro-synthetic polypropylene fibers (Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Concrete, PFRC) in combination with a lower amount of conventional rebars (optimized reinforcement, RCO) for guaranteeing the required segment performance. Experimental results indicate that macro-synthetic fibers may be very effective in combination with conventional rebars to withstand the main stresses that arise in a segment both at initial and final phases, proving that the adoption of hybrid reinforcement solution using macro-synthetic fiber is possible for metro tunnel lining.

Precast tunnel segments for metro tunnel lining: A hybrid reinforcement solution using macro-synthetic fibers

Conforti A.;Trabucchi I.;Tiberti G.;Plizzari G. A.;Meda A.
2019-01-01

Abstract

The addition of fibers has been proven successful to simplify reinforcement in precast tunnel segments, allowing as a function of both segment typology and fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) toughness a total or partial replacement of the conventional reinforcement. Results from an experimental research aimed at comparing the structural behavior of segments made with conventional (only rebars, RC) or hybrid (rebars + fibers) reinforcement are presented. The experimental program consisted of flexural and point load tests (which reproduces the jack actions during TBM operations) carried out on four large-scale precast tunnel segments representative of a metro tunnel lining characterized by an internal diameter of 5.80 m and a thickness of 0.30 m. The main goal of the experimental program was to evaluate the possibility of using macro-synthetic polypropylene fibers (Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Concrete, PFRC) in combination with a lower amount of conventional rebars (optimized reinforcement, RCO) for guaranteeing the required segment performance. Experimental results indicate that macro-synthetic fibers may be very effective in combination with conventional rebars to withstand the main stresses that arise in a segment both at initial and final phases, proving that the adoption of hybrid reinforcement solution using macro-synthetic fiber is possible for metro tunnel lining.
2019
2019
Ateneo di appartenenza
PE8_3 Civil engineering, maritime/hydraulic engineering, geotechnics, waste treatment
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
Internazionale
STAMPA
199
11
Article number 109628
Fiber reinforced concrete; Hybrid reinforcement; Macro-synthetic fibers; Metro tunnel lining; Precast tunnel segments
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029619301257?via=ihub
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109628
no
6
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Conforti, A.; Trabucchi, I.; Tiberti, G.; Plizzari, G. A.; Caratelli, A.; Meda, A.
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/524933
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 73
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 61
social impact