Prevalence of scoliosis within spina bifida subpopulations is important for diagnostics and therapeutic purposes. This review determined the prevalence of scoliosis within spina bifida subpopulations by means of a systematic literature review by using the following databases: Medline-Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and Pedro. All Dutch- and English-written literature using the MESH-terms: "Spinal Dysraphism", "Neural Tube Defects", "Scoliosis" was analysed using the exclusion criteria: animal studies, case reports, studies regarding the prevalence of spina bifida among patients with scoliosis, studies with inclusion of patients with scoliosis <11° without possibility to identify subgroups with scoliosis >10°, studies without an own study group, articles comprising the same patient group as another article, neural tube defects besides spina bifida and articles without specification of spina bifida subtype. It resulted in six articles, two concerning diastematomyelia (103 patients, 82 females and 21 males), four about myelomeningocele (479 patients, 283 females and 196 males) with an overall weighted prevalence of scoliosis (20° Cobb angle cut off) of 44.4% and 52.5% respectively. It can be concluded that most studies have a lot of methodological flaws so there is a need for further research with standardisation of data collection to allow comparison of different data.
The prevalence of scoliosis in spina bifida subpopulations: a systematic review
Negrini, Stefano;
2018-01-01
Abstract
Prevalence of scoliosis within spina bifida subpopulations is important for diagnostics and therapeutic purposes. This review determined the prevalence of scoliosis within spina bifida subpopulations by means of a systematic literature review by using the following databases: Medline-Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and Pedro. All Dutch- and English-written literature using the MESH-terms: "Spinal Dysraphism", "Neural Tube Defects", "Scoliosis" was analysed using the exclusion criteria: animal studies, case reports, studies regarding the prevalence of spina bifida among patients with scoliosis, studies with inclusion of patients with scoliosis <11° without possibility to identify subgroups with scoliosis >10°, studies without an own study group, articles comprising the same patient group as another article, neural tube defects besides spina bifida and articles without specification of spina bifida subtype. It resulted in six articles, two concerning diastematomyelia (103 patients, 82 females and 21 males), four about myelomeningocele (479 patients, 283 females and 196 males) with an overall weighted prevalence of scoliosis (20° Cobb angle cut off) of 44.4% and 52.5% respectively. It can be concluded that most studies have a lot of methodological flaws so there is a need for further research with standardisation of data collection to allow comparison of different data.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
