Different tests are proposed by international standards for the evaluation of the mechanical properties of fiber reinforced concrete (FRC); among them, either beams or round determinate panels are generally used. However, different tests are accepted by design codes if reliable correlation factors between standard parameters are provided (fib Model Code 2010). Within this context, a broad experimental program on both beams and round determinate panels was carried out in order to provide a critical discussion on material characterization and to evaluate possible correlation factors. Beam tests according to European (EN 14651), American (ASTM 1609), and Japanese (JCI-SF4) standard, as well as small round panels and large round panels (according to ASTM 1550) were studied within an experimental program comprising 189 beams and 90 round panels. Unlike previous researches, mainly focused on steel fibers, two types of macro-synthetic fibers were considered. Based on these experimental results, a comparison between test methods is presented, along with correlation approaches are proposed and critically discussed.

Comparing test methods for the mechanical characterization of fiber reinforced concrete

Conforti, Antonio;Minelli, Fausto;Plizzari, Giovanni A.
;
Tiberti, Giuseppe
2018-01-01

Abstract

Different tests are proposed by international standards for the evaluation of the mechanical properties of fiber reinforced concrete (FRC); among them, either beams or round determinate panels are generally used. However, different tests are accepted by design codes if reliable correlation factors between standard parameters are provided (fib Model Code 2010). Within this context, a broad experimental program on both beams and round determinate panels was carried out in order to provide a critical discussion on material characterization and to evaluate possible correlation factors. Beam tests according to European (EN 14651), American (ASTM 1609), and Japanese (JCI-SF4) standard, as well as small round panels and large round panels (according to ASTM 1550) were studied within an experimental program comprising 189 beams and 90 round panels. Unlike previous researches, mainly focused on steel fibers, two types of macro-synthetic fibers were considered. Based on these experimental results, a comparison between test methods is presented, along with correlation approaches are proposed and critically discussed.
2018
2018
Altre fonti
PE8_3 Civil engineering, maritime/hydraulic engineering, geotechnics, waste treatment
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
Internazionale
STAMPA
19
3
656
669
14
Beam tests; Fiber reinforced concrete; Fracture toughness; Mechanical characterization; Polypropylene fibers; Round panel tests; Civil and Structural Engineering; Building and Construction; Materials Science (all); Mechanics of Materials
Ateneo di appartenenza
https://www-scopus-com.proxy.unibs.it/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85030973797&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&sid=897d02c50ae337199731121cd74d934d&sot=autdocs&sdt=autdocs&sl=18&s=AU-ID%2812805544200%29&relpos=10&citeCnt=1&searchTerm=
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/suco.201700057
no
4
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Conforti, Antonio; Minelli, Fausto; Plizzari, Giovanni A.; Tiberti, Giuseppe
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/502023
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 60
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 45
social impact