Although the dispute between formative models and reflective models is not exactly recent, it is still alive in current literature, largely in the context of structural equation model. There are many aspects of SEM that should be considered in deciding the right approach. This work is intended to be a brief presentation of the state of the art for SEM based on covariance matrices. I outline the different positions on five particular issues: causality, selection of observed measures, internal consistency, identifiability and measurement error.
Formative and reflective models: state of the art
SIMONETTO, Anna
2012-01-01
Abstract
Although the dispute between formative models and reflective models is not exactly recent, it is still alive in current literature, largely in the context of structural equation model. There are many aspects of SEM that should be considered in deciding the right approach. This work is intended to be a brief presentation of the state of the art for SEM based on covariance matrices. I outline the different positions on five particular issues: causality, selection of observed measures, internal consistency, identifiability and measurement error.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2012 - EJASA - Formative and reflective models state of the art.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Creative Commons 3.1
Dimensione
736.52 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
736.52 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.