In Distributed Video Coding the signal prediction is shifted at the decoder side, giving therefore most of the computational complexity burden at the receiver. Moreover, since no prediction loop exists before transmission, an intrinsic robustness to transmission errors has been claimed. This work evaluates and compares the error resilience performance of two distributed video coding architectures. In particular, we have considered a video codec based on the Stanford architecture (DISCOVER1 codec) and a video codec based on the PRISM architecture. Specifically, an accurate temporal and Rate/Distortion based evaluation of the effects of the transmission errors for both the considered DVC architectures have been performed and discussed. These approaches have been also compared with H.264/AVC, in both cases of no error protection, and simple FEC error protection. Our evaluations have highlighted in all cases a strong dependence of the behaviour of the various codecs to the content of the considered video sequence. In particular, PRISM seems to be particularly well suited for low motion sequences, whereas DISCOVER provides better performance in the other cases.

Error Resilience in Current Distributed Video Coding Architectures

TONOLI, Claudia;MIGLIORATI, Pierangelo;LEONARDI, Riccardo
2009-01-01

Abstract

In Distributed Video Coding the signal prediction is shifted at the decoder side, giving therefore most of the computational complexity burden at the receiver. Moreover, since no prediction loop exists before transmission, an intrinsic robustness to transmission errors has been claimed. This work evaluates and compares the error resilience performance of two distributed video coding architectures. In particular, we have considered a video codec based on the Stanford architecture (DISCOVER1 codec) and a video codec based on the PRISM architecture. Specifically, an accurate temporal and Rate/Distortion based evaluation of the effects of the transmission errors for both the considered DVC architectures have been performed and discussed. These approaches have been also compared with H.264/AVC, in both cases of no error protection, and simple FEC error protection. Our evaluations have highlighted in all cases a strong dependence of the behaviour of the various codecs to the content of the considered video sequence. In particular, PRISM seems to be particularly well suited for low motion sequences, whereas DISCOVER provides better performance in the other cases.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
TML_EJIVP-2009_full-text.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: TML_EJIVP-2009_full-text
Tipologia: Full Text
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.93 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.93 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/34505
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact