Abstract Objective: The pressure–volume index (PVI) can be used to assess the cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and intracranial elastance in critically ill brain injured patients. The dependency of PVI on the state of cerebral autoregulation within the physiologic range of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) can be described by mathematical models that account for changes in cerebral blood volume during PVI testing. This relationship has never been verified clinically using direct PVI measurement and independent cerebral autoregulation assessment. Design, setting, and patients: PVI and cerebral autoregulation were prospectively assessed in a cohort of 19 comatose patients admitted to an academic intensive care unit in Brescia, Italy. Intervention: None. Methods: PVI was measured injecting a fixed volume of 2 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride solution into the cerebral ventricles through an intraventricular catheter. Cerebral autoregulation was assessed using transcranial Doppler transient hyperaemic response (THR) test. Measurements and results: Fiftynine PVI assessments and 59 THR tests were performed. Mean PVI was 20.0 (SD 10.2) millilitres in sessions when autoregulation was intact (THR test C1.1) and 31.6 (8.8) millilitres in sessions with defective autoregulation (THR test\1.1) (DPVI = 11.7 ml, 95% CI = 4.7–19.3 ml; P = 0.002). Intracranial pressure, CPP and brain CT findings were not significantly different between the measurements with intact and disturbed autoregulation. Conclusions: Cerebral autoregulation status can affect PVI estimation despite a normal CPP. PVI measurement may overestimate the tolerance of the intracranial system to volume loads in patients with disturbed cerebral autoregulation.

The relationship between the intracranial pressure-volume index and cerebral autoregulation.

RASULO, Francesco Antonio;LATRONICO, Nicola
2009-01-01

Abstract

Abstract Objective: The pressure–volume index (PVI) can be used to assess the cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and intracranial elastance in critically ill brain injured patients. The dependency of PVI on the state of cerebral autoregulation within the physiologic range of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) can be described by mathematical models that account for changes in cerebral blood volume during PVI testing. This relationship has never been verified clinically using direct PVI measurement and independent cerebral autoregulation assessment. Design, setting, and patients: PVI and cerebral autoregulation were prospectively assessed in a cohort of 19 comatose patients admitted to an academic intensive care unit in Brescia, Italy. Intervention: None. Methods: PVI was measured injecting a fixed volume of 2 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride solution into the cerebral ventricles through an intraventricular catheter. Cerebral autoregulation was assessed using transcranial Doppler transient hyperaemic response (THR) test. Measurements and results: Fiftynine PVI assessments and 59 THR tests were performed. Mean PVI was 20.0 (SD 10.2) millilitres in sessions when autoregulation was intact (THR test C1.1) and 31.6 (8.8) millilitres in sessions with defective autoregulation (THR test\1.1) (DPVI = 11.7 ml, 95% CI = 4.7–19.3 ml; P = 0.002). Intracranial pressure, CPP and brain CT findings were not significantly different between the measurements with intact and disturbed autoregulation. Conclusions: Cerebral autoregulation status can affect PVI estimation despite a normal CPP. PVI measurement may overestimate the tolerance of the intracranial system to volume loads in patients with disturbed cerebral autoregulation.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ICM09 HT PVI_CVautoregulation.pdf

gestori archivio

Tipologia: Full Text
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 153.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
153.33 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/33692
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact