Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEI) such as donepezil act in mild Alzheimer’s disease (AD) by increasing cholinergic tone. Differences in the clinical response in patients who do or do not benefit from therapy may be due to different functional features of the central neural systems. We tested this hypothesis using cortical electroencephalographic (EEG) rhythmicity. Resting eyesclosed EEG data were recorded in 58 mild AD patients (Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE] range 17– 24) before and approximately 1 year after standard donepezil treatment. Based on changes of MMSE scores between baseline and follow-up, 28 patients were classified as ‘‘Responders’’ (MMSEvar 0) and 30 patients as ‘‘Non-Responders’’ (MMSEvar <0). EEG rhythms of interest were delta (2– 4 Hz), theta (4– 8 Hz), alpha 1 (8–10.5 Hz), alpha 2 (10.5–13 Hz), beta 1 (13– 20 Hz), and beta 2 (20– 30 Hz). Cortical EEG sources were studied with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). Before treatment, posterior sources of delta, alpha 1 and alpha 2 frequencies were greater in amplitude in Non-Responders. After treatment, a lesser magnitude reduction of occipital and temporal alpha 1 sources characterized Responders. These results suggest that Responders and Non-Responders had different EEG cortical rhythms. Donepezil could act by reactivating existing yet functionally silent cortical synapses in Responders, restoring temporal and occipital alpha rhythms.

Donepezil effects on sources of cortical rhythms in mild Alzheimer's disease: Responders vs. Non-Responders.

MINIUSSI, Carlo;
2006-01-01

Abstract

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEI) such as donepezil act in mild Alzheimer’s disease (AD) by increasing cholinergic tone. Differences in the clinical response in patients who do or do not benefit from therapy may be due to different functional features of the central neural systems. We tested this hypothesis using cortical electroencephalographic (EEG) rhythmicity. Resting eyesclosed EEG data were recorded in 58 mild AD patients (Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE] range 17– 24) before and approximately 1 year after standard donepezil treatment. Based on changes of MMSE scores between baseline and follow-up, 28 patients were classified as ‘‘Responders’’ (MMSEvar 0) and 30 patients as ‘‘Non-Responders’’ (MMSEvar <0). EEG rhythms of interest were delta (2– 4 Hz), theta (4– 8 Hz), alpha 1 (8–10.5 Hz), alpha 2 (10.5–13 Hz), beta 1 (13– 20 Hz), and beta 2 (20– 30 Hz). Cortical EEG sources were studied with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). Before treatment, posterior sources of delta, alpha 1 and alpha 2 frequencies were greater in amplitude in Non-Responders. After treatment, a lesser magnitude reduction of occipital and temporal alpha 1 sources characterized Responders. These results suggest that Responders and Non-Responders had different EEG cortical rhythms. Donepezil could act by reactivating existing yet functionally silent cortical synapses in Responders, restoring temporal and occipital alpha rhythms.
2006
Sogg. privati ital. no profit
LS7_7 Surgery
LS7_6 Gene therapy, stem cell therapy, regenerative medicine
LS5_2 Neurophysiology
LS5_7 Cognition (e.g. learning, memory, emotions, speech)
LS7_2 Diagnostic tools (e.g. genetic, imaging)
LS4_4 Ageing
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Inglese
Internazionale
15; 31, 4
1650
1665
16
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
C., Babiloni; E., Cassetta; G., Dal Forno; C., Del Percio; F., Ferreri; R., Ferri; B., Lanuzza; Miniussi, Carlo; D., Moretti; F., Nobili; R., Pascual ...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
reserved
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Neuroimage_Babiloni_06.pdf

gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 891.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
891.14 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/26051
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact