Background: Reduction of cerebral blood flow plays a crucial role in causing posttraumatic cerebral ischemia. However, the methodologic adequacy of studies from which currently used cerebral blood flow thresholds in traumatic brain injury have been derived has not been evaluated. Objective: To systematically evaluate the evidence available on cerebral blood flow thresholds and its methodologic adequacy in adults with traumatic brain injury. Methods: Included were primary studies on adults with traumatic brain injury in which cerebral blood flow thresholds were evaluated and reported, and follow-up brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was used as the gold standard for diagnosing the finally infarcted area. Results: Among the 53 diagnostic studies identified, 31 did not report any threshold value, whereas 20 studies used thresholds derived from the literature, mainly animal or clinical studies on ischemic stroke. One study measured cerebral blood flow thresholds, but did not use accepted neuroradiological criteria for the diagnosis of posttraumatic cerebral ischemia. The remaining study fulfilled all methodologic inclusion criteria, but was restricted to 14 patients with severe traumatic brain injury and cerebral contusion. This study proposed a cerebral blood flow threshold of 15 mL/100 mL/min, with sensitivity and specificity of 43% and 95%, respectively. Conclusions: Cerebral blood flow thresholds for the diagnosis of posttraumatic cerebral ischemia are based on weak evidence, and cannot be recommended
Validity of the cerebral blood flow thresholds for the diagnosis of acute brain ischemia in head trauma. A systematic review.
LATRONICO, Nicola
2008-01-01
Abstract
Background: Reduction of cerebral blood flow plays a crucial role in causing posttraumatic cerebral ischemia. However, the methodologic adequacy of studies from which currently used cerebral blood flow thresholds in traumatic brain injury have been derived has not been evaluated. Objective: To systematically evaluate the evidence available on cerebral blood flow thresholds and its methodologic adequacy in adults with traumatic brain injury. Methods: Included were primary studies on adults with traumatic brain injury in which cerebral blood flow thresholds were evaluated and reported, and follow-up brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was used as the gold standard for diagnosing the finally infarcted area. Results: Among the 53 diagnostic studies identified, 31 did not report any threshold value, whereas 20 studies used thresholds derived from the literature, mainly animal or clinical studies on ischemic stroke. One study measured cerebral blood flow thresholds, but did not use accepted neuroradiological criteria for the diagnosis of posttraumatic cerebral ischemia. The remaining study fulfilled all methodologic inclusion criteria, but was restricted to 14 patients with severe traumatic brain injury and cerebral contusion. This study proposed a cerebral blood flow threshold of 15 mL/100 mL/min, with sensitivity and specificity of 43% and 95%, respectively. Conclusions: Cerebral blood flow thresholds for the diagnosis of posttraumatic cerebral ischemia are based on weak evidence, and cannot be recommendedFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CCM08 HT CBFtrhesholdsPostTraumaticCerebralIschemia SR.pdf
gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Full Text
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
194.52 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
194.52 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.