Buildings play a central role in global decarbonization efforts, given their substantial contribution to greenhouse gas emissions throughout a build-ing's life cycle. To address this challenge, it is essential to minimize the environmental footprint of the construction sector through holistic as-sessment tools and innovative solutions. This study conducts a compara-tive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of two technological construction so-lutions, steel and reinforced concrete, within the context of a 14-story building refurbishment project in Pisa, Italy, with the final goal of deter-mining the potentiality of the LCA methodology in identifying the most suitable solution in terms of sustainability and environmental impacts. Adopting a cradle-to-grave approach, the analysis examines the envi-ronmental trade-offs of these systems across 13 impact categories out-lined in the Level(s) framework, using localized datasets and ISO 14040-44 methodology. The research identifies critical differences in the carbon footprint of the two solutions, with the steel frame exhibiting 23% lower carbon emissions than the concrete frame. Furthermore, the study evalu-ates the potential of using Recycled and Renewably Produced (RRP) steel elements to enhance sustainability further. The findings highlight the importance of integrating LCA in the early design phases to make a sustainable choice in terms of construction materials and technological solutions. By highlighting context-specific environmental impacts, this research provides actionable insights for professionals, Small and medi-um-sized enterprises (SMEs) and policymakers aiming to advance decar-bonization efforts in the built environment.

Assessing Environmental Impacts of Buildings: An LCA Comparison of Technological Construction Solutions for a Building Refurbishment in Italy

Sesana, Marta Maria
;
Dell'Oro, Paolo;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Buildings play a central role in global decarbonization efforts, given their substantial contribution to greenhouse gas emissions throughout a build-ing's life cycle. To address this challenge, it is essential to minimize the environmental footprint of the construction sector through holistic as-sessment tools and innovative solutions. This study conducts a compara-tive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of two technological construction so-lutions, steel and reinforced concrete, within the context of a 14-story building refurbishment project in Pisa, Italy, with the final goal of deter-mining the potentiality of the LCA methodology in identifying the most suitable solution in terms of sustainability and environmental impacts. Adopting a cradle-to-grave approach, the analysis examines the envi-ronmental trade-offs of these systems across 13 impact categories out-lined in the Level(s) framework, using localized datasets and ISO 14040-44 methodology. The research identifies critical differences in the carbon footprint of the two solutions, with the steel frame exhibiting 23% lower carbon emissions than the concrete frame. Furthermore, the study evalu-ates the potential of using Recycled and Renewably Produced (RRP) steel elements to enhance sustainability further. The findings highlight the importance of integrating LCA in the early design phases to make a sustainable choice in terms of construction materials and technological solutions. By highlighting context-specific environmental impacts, this research provides actionable insights for professionals, Small and medi-um-sized enterprises (SMEs) and policymakers aiming to advance decar-bonization efforts in the built environment.
2025
9783032069924
9783032069931
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ArtTec2025_Full Paper_LCAcomparison_SESANA.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Full Text
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 726.97 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
726.97 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/635489
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact