The chapter develops critical reflections on the relationships between urban planning strategies, urban regeneration, and the vulnerabilities of older adults living in Brescia, a mid-sized northern Italian city. Specifically, it focuses on the dynamics through which local planning logics either support or undermine the right of older adults to autonomously participate in the life of the city. It exam-ines how the definitions of “vulnerable subject” emerging from key planning tools (in) directly create conditions that can be described as “planning-induced depen-dency” and heightened vulnerability for marginalized residents, including older adults. Drawing on feminist debates in sociology, planning theory, and political philosophy, the chapter critically analyzes urban policies implemented in the city over the past two decades and their effects on ensuring—or hindering—the right of older adults to live dignified and self-determined lives. It also challenges hege-monic definitions of “independence” and “vulnerability” that emerge from the plans and documents orienting local urban governance. By developing critical discus-sions around the “right to self-determination,” the chapter introduces a developing interpretative framework aimed at comprehensively understanding the contradictions and effects of specific planning logics on the capabilities for self-determination of radically plural subjectivities living in the contemporary city.

Planning Strategies, Vulnerabilities, and the Right of Older Adults to Self-Determination: Reflections from Brescia (Northern Italy)

Alioni, Marco
;
Badiani, Barbara
2026-01-01

Abstract

The chapter develops critical reflections on the relationships between urban planning strategies, urban regeneration, and the vulnerabilities of older adults living in Brescia, a mid-sized northern Italian city. Specifically, it focuses on the dynamics through which local planning logics either support or undermine the right of older adults to autonomously participate in the life of the city. It exam-ines how the definitions of “vulnerable subject” emerging from key planning tools (in) directly create conditions that can be described as “planning-induced depen-dency” and heightened vulnerability for marginalized residents, including older adults. Drawing on feminist debates in sociology, planning theory, and political philosophy, the chapter critically analyzes urban policies implemented in the city over the past two decades and their effects on ensuring—or hindering—the right of older adults to live dignified and self-determined lives. It also challenges hege-monic definitions of “independence” and “vulnerability” that emerge from the plans and documents orienting local urban governance. By developing critical discus-sions around the “right to self-determination,” the chapter introduces a developing interpretative framework aimed at comprehensively understanding the contradictions and effects of specific planning logics on the capabilities for self-determination of radically plural subjectivities living in the contemporary city.
2026
9783032042644
9783032042651
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
978-3-032-04265-1_6-1.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Creative Commons 4.0
Dimensione 1.02 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.02 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/641525
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact