This paper traces the evolution of nationality from a traditional expression of State sovereignty to a matter of international human rights concern. Historically governed by domestic jurisdiction, citizenship law underwent a profound transformation after the Second World War, when the human cost of denationalization and statelessness led to the recognition of nationality as a fundamental right in Article 15 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Building on the 1954 and 1961 Statelessness Conventions, international law increasingly limits State discretion in nationality matters to safeguard human dignity and prevent exclusion. The analysis explores how refugees and stateless persons continue to face systemic marginalization in the absence of citizenship, despite robust legal frameworks. Central to the discussion is the emergence of the ius nexi principle, which redefines citizenship as grounded in genuine social and personal connections rather than formal criteria of birth or descent. Drawing on jurisprudence from the ICJ, ECtHR, CJEU, and national constitutional courts, the paper argues that ius nexi offers a substantive, human-centered approach to belonging and inclusion. However, it also highlights the risks of indeterminacy and uneven application, underscoring the need for shared legal standards to ensure fairness and prevent arbitrariness in contemporary citizenship regimes.

"From State Sovereignty to Human Rights: The Evolving Legal Framework of Citizenship in International Law”

C. Di Stasio
2026-01-01

Abstract

This paper traces the evolution of nationality from a traditional expression of State sovereignty to a matter of international human rights concern. Historically governed by domestic jurisdiction, citizenship law underwent a profound transformation after the Second World War, when the human cost of denationalization and statelessness led to the recognition of nationality as a fundamental right in Article 15 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Building on the 1954 and 1961 Statelessness Conventions, international law increasingly limits State discretion in nationality matters to safeguard human dignity and prevent exclusion. The analysis explores how refugees and stateless persons continue to face systemic marginalization in the absence of citizenship, despite robust legal frameworks. Central to the discussion is the emergence of the ius nexi principle, which redefines citizenship as grounded in genuine social and personal connections rather than formal criteria of birth or descent. Drawing on jurisprudence from the ICJ, ECtHR, CJEU, and national constitutional courts, the paper argues that ius nexi offers a substantive, human-centered approach to belonging and inclusion. However, it also highlights the risks of indeterminacy and uneven application, underscoring the need for shared legal standards to ensure fairness and prevent arbitrariness in contemporary citizenship regimes.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
DI STASIO CITTADINANZA DEF PDF .pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 828.76 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
828.76 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/633970
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact