Resilience is the system ability to adjust its functioning prior to, during, or following changes and perturbations. Resilience Engineering represents a new paradigm to improve safety, focusing on how to create resilience in systems. The resilience measurement supports decision making processes, but it is not a trivial task. Therefore, the objectives of this paper are: (1) to critically analyze the literature about quantitative resilience assessments in the industrial safety domain, and (2) to propose a novel three-tier approach for measuring and assessing the resilience potential in any organization in the same domain. To achieve our objectives, we performed a narrative literature review about the existing approaches, frameworks, and methods quantifying and ranking resilience indicators, and/or estimating an overall resilience score. Multi-Criteria Decision Making and Bayesian Network approaches are frequently employed for such purposes. The results gathered through the narrative review represent a key source for developing a novel tiered approach. We propose an approach able to quantitatively assess the resilience potential in the industrial safety domain that consists of three tiers. A knowledge-driven tier assesses resilience by using the knowledge of decision makers through techniques involving judgements, a knowledge and data-driven tier incorporates methods considering both expert knowledge under uncertainty and objective data, while a data-driven tier includes models performing resilience assessments entirely based on data provided by devices and information systems in the organization.

Towards a Novel Tiered Approach to Assess the Resilience Level in the Safety Domain

Stefana Elena;Strazzari Carolina;Marciano Filippo;Carnevale Claudio
2021-01-01

Abstract

Resilience is the system ability to adjust its functioning prior to, during, or following changes and perturbations. Resilience Engineering represents a new paradigm to improve safety, focusing on how to create resilience in systems. The resilience measurement supports decision making processes, but it is not a trivial task. Therefore, the objectives of this paper are: (1) to critically analyze the literature about quantitative resilience assessments in the industrial safety domain, and (2) to propose a novel three-tier approach for measuring and assessing the resilience potential in any organization in the same domain. To achieve our objectives, we performed a narrative literature review about the existing approaches, frameworks, and methods quantifying and ranking resilience indicators, and/or estimating an overall resilience score. Multi-Criteria Decision Making and Bayesian Network approaches are frequently employed for such purposes. The results gathered through the narrative review represent a key source for developing a novel tiered approach. We propose an approach able to quantitatively assess the resilience potential in the industrial safety domain that consists of three tiers. A knowledge-driven tier assesses resilience by using the knowledge of decision makers through techniques involving judgements, a knowledge and data-driven tier incorporates methods considering both expert knowledge under uncertainty and objective data, while a data-driven tier includes models performing resilience assessments entirely based on data provided by devices and information systems in the organization.
2021
978-981-18-2016-8
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/561695
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact