Since its introduction, FRC has gained quite high attention from precast industry for the potential advantages resulting from partial or total removal of conventional reinforcement, especially related to shear. As compared to non-prestressed elements, the use of precompression may allow to significantly reduce the required amount of transversal reinforcement, taking advantage of the shear force carried by prestressing tendons/cable. As proved by several research studies, the adoption of fibers may further reduce shear reinforcement, which could be only limited to support areas or to those regions where the prestressing action is not fully developed. The current structural codes are generally very conservative in predicting the shear strength of these elements. Therefore, new research studies are needed to improve the accuracy of models for calculating the shear strength. Special focus could be also done to existing prestressed structures, which might benefit from more refined models in terms of reduction of structural repairing costs. This paper presents a database of shear tests of prestressed FRC members, emphasizing the rather conservative predictions of the prEN 1992-1-1 (2020) and fib Model Code 2020 drafts. A critical discussion will follow.

Code Provisions for Shear Strength in Prestressed FRC Members: A Critical Review

Mantelli S. G.;Facconi L.
;
Medeghini F.;Mark P.;Minelli F.;Plizzari G.
2022-01-01

Abstract

Since its introduction, FRC has gained quite high attention from precast industry for the potential advantages resulting from partial or total removal of conventional reinforcement, especially related to shear. As compared to non-prestressed elements, the use of precompression may allow to significantly reduce the required amount of transversal reinforcement, taking advantage of the shear force carried by prestressing tendons/cable. As proved by several research studies, the adoption of fibers may further reduce shear reinforcement, which could be only limited to support areas or to those regions where the prestressing action is not fully developed. The current structural codes are generally very conservative in predicting the shear strength of these elements. Therefore, new research studies are needed to improve the accuracy of models for calculating the shear strength. Special focus could be also done to existing prestressed structures, which might benefit from more refined models in terms of reduction of structural repairing costs. This paper presents a database of shear tests of prestressed FRC members, emphasizing the rather conservative predictions of the prEN 1992-1-1 (2020) and fib Model Code 2020 drafts. A critical discussion will follow.
2022
Ateneo di appartenenza
RILEM Bookseries
Mantelli, S.G.; Facconi, L.; Look, K.; Medeghini, F.; Mark, P.; Minelli, F.; Plizzari, G.
PE8_3 Civil engineering, maritime/hydraulic engineering, geotechnics, waste treatment
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
Internazionale
ELETTRONICO
36
579
589
11
978-3-030-83718-1
978-3-030-83719-8
Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
Database; Fib Model Code 2020; Fiber Reinforced Concrete; prEN 1992-1-1; Prestressed members; Shear
Nessuno
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-83719-8_50
Not applicable
2 Contributo in Volume::2.1 Contributo in volume (Capitolo o Saggio)
7
268
restricted
Mantelli, S. G.; Facconi, L.; Look, K.; Medeghini, F.; Mark, P.; Minelli, F.; Plizzari, G.
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Paper_ID143.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Testo completo dell'articolo
Tipologia: Full Text
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 634.62 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
634.62 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/552035
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact