In recent years, the use of Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) to evaluate environmental benefits resulting from the production of biofuel from microalgae has continued to evolve. Literature in this field shows that one of the main challenges associated with the effect of biofuel production on the environment is the high energy consumption necessary in the microalgae harvesting phase to achieve the level of dewatering required to the next steps. Moreover, detailed LCAs specifically focused on the assessment of alternative technologies for the harvesting of microalgae have yet to be presented. As such, the aim of this paper is to analyze the potential environmental benefits and shortcomings arising from the use of flocculation for the harvesting of microalgae in the biofuel production process, with particular attention to the Canadian context. The method employed is a comparative LCA, where two alternative scenarios based on the application of two harvesting technologies are taken into account: (1) flocculation and centrifugation and (2) direct centrifugation (without flocculation). The calculations of environmental impact and the sensitivity analysis are performed with the SimaPro software. © 2017 The Authors.

Comparative LCA of Flocculation for the Harvesting of Microalgae for Biofuels Production

Collotta, Massimo;Champagne, Pascale;Tomasoni, Giuseppe;Alberti, Marco
2017-01-01

Abstract

In recent years, the use of Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) to evaluate environmental benefits resulting from the production of biofuel from microalgae has continued to evolve. Literature in this field shows that one of the main challenges associated with the effect of biofuel production on the environment is the high energy consumption necessary in the microalgae harvesting phase to achieve the level of dewatering required to the next steps. Moreover, detailed LCAs specifically focused on the assessment of alternative technologies for the harvesting of microalgae have yet to be presented. As such, the aim of this paper is to analyze the potential environmental benefits and shortcomings arising from the use of flocculation for the harvesting of microalgae in the biofuel production process, with particular attention to the Canadian context. The method employed is a comparative LCA, where two alternative scenarios based on the application of two harvesting technologies are taken into account: (1) flocculation and centrifugation and (2) direct centrifugation (without flocculation). The calculations of environmental impact and the sensitivity analysis are performed with the SimaPro software. © 2017 The Authors.
2017
Procedia CIRP
Ateneo di appartenenza
Collotta, Massimo*; Champagne, Pascale; Mabee, Warren; Tomasoni, Giuseppe; Leite, Gustavo; Busi, Leonardo; Alberti, Marco
PE8_12 Sustainable design (for recycling, for environment, eco-design)
SH3_4 Social and industrial ecology
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
no
24th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, CIRP LCE 2017
2017
jpn
Internazionale
ELETTRONICO
61
756
760
5
Elsevier B.V.
biodiesel from microalgae; centrifugation; life cycle assessment; microalgae flocculation; microalgae harvesting; Control and Systems Engineering; Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/22128271
none
Collotta, Massimo; Champagne, Pascale; Mabee, Warren; Tomasoni, Giuseppe; Leite, Gustavo B.; Busi, Leonardo; Alberti, Marco
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
7
4 Contributo in Atti di Convegno (Proceeding)::4.1 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/502062
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 45
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 33
social impact