Objectives To assess the umbilical-cerebral ratio (UC) in the prediction of abnormal acid–base status at birth in a cohort of small for gestational age (SGA) late preterm fetuses. Methods Retrospective cohort study. From 2011 to 2015 we included singleton fetuses with estimated birthweight or fetal abdominal circumference ≤ 10th centile, delivered between 32+1 and 37+0 weeks' gestation. Pregnancies complicated by fetal abnormalities, aneuploidy or stillbirth were excluded. The umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI), and umbilical arterial cord blood pH (UA-pH) were recorded. UC was calculated by dividing UA-PI by MCA-PI. Values >1 were considered abnormal. Poor neonatal acid–base status at birth was defined as UA-pH < 7.1. To limit the treatment paradox we analysed only cases where fetal Doppler were assessed at the time of presentation, between 30 and 8 days from delivery. The birthweight (BW) values and Doppler parameters were converted into Z scores adjusting for gestational age using reference ranges. Results The study cohort included 95 fetuses. There were 4/95 cases with UA-pH < 7.1. Median gestational age at delivery was 35+1 weeks (IQR 34+0 to 36+2), median BW Z score was −1.5 (IQR −2.08 to −0.79). The UC ratio at the time of presentation was >1 in 7/95 cases. The relative risk of abnormal acid–base status at birth with abnormal UC was 12.6 (p = 0.02). The sensitivity and specificity of high UC for predicting UA-pH <7.1 were 33.3% and 96.3%; likelihood ratio (+) 7.7, likelihood ratio (−) 0.7. Post-test probability of UA-pH <7.1 with abnormal UC increased from 4% to 24%. Conclusions Although abnormal UC increased moderately the probability of UA-pH <7.1 at birth; this test performs poorly for the prediction of abnormal acid–base status in SGA late preterm newborns.

Umbilical cerebral ratio for detection of poor neonatal acid–base status in small-for-gestational age late preterm fetuses

ORABONA, ROSSANA;CAVALLI, CECILIA;AZZARETTO, Vita Valentina;VITUCCI, Annachiara;FRANCESCHETTI, Laura;FICHERA, Anna;VALCAMONICO, ADRIANA;PREFUMO, FEDERICO
2016-01-01

Abstract

Objectives To assess the umbilical-cerebral ratio (UC) in the prediction of abnormal acid–base status at birth in a cohort of small for gestational age (SGA) late preterm fetuses. Methods Retrospective cohort study. From 2011 to 2015 we included singleton fetuses with estimated birthweight or fetal abdominal circumference ≤ 10th centile, delivered between 32+1 and 37+0 weeks' gestation. Pregnancies complicated by fetal abnormalities, aneuploidy or stillbirth were excluded. The umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI), and umbilical arterial cord blood pH (UA-pH) were recorded. UC was calculated by dividing UA-PI by MCA-PI. Values >1 were considered abnormal. Poor neonatal acid–base status at birth was defined as UA-pH < 7.1. To limit the treatment paradox we analysed only cases where fetal Doppler were assessed at the time of presentation, between 30 and 8 days from delivery. The birthweight (BW) values and Doppler parameters were converted into Z scores adjusting for gestational age using reference ranges. Results The study cohort included 95 fetuses. There were 4/95 cases with UA-pH < 7.1. Median gestational age at delivery was 35+1 weeks (IQR 34+0 to 36+2), median BW Z score was −1.5 (IQR −2.08 to −0.79). The UC ratio at the time of presentation was >1 in 7/95 cases. The relative risk of abnormal acid–base status at birth with abnormal UC was 12.6 (p = 0.02). The sensitivity and specificity of high UC for predicting UA-pH <7.1 were 33.3% and 96.3%; likelihood ratio (+) 7.7, likelihood ratio (−) 0.7. Post-test probability of UA-pH <7.1 with abnormal UC increased from 4% to 24%. Conclusions Although abnormal UC increased moderately the probability of UA-pH <7.1 at birth; this test performs poorly for the prediction of abnormal acid–base status in SGA late preterm newborns.
2016
Nessuno
abstracts of the 26th World Congress on Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rome, Italy, 24–28 September 2016
LS7_2 Diagnostic tools (e.g. genetic, imaging)
LS7_9 Health services, health care research
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
no
26th world congress on ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
24-28 settembre 2016
Roma
Internazionale
ELETTRONICO
48-S1
263
264
2
wiley
10
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
none
274
4 Contributo in Atti di Convegno (Proceeding)::4.2 Abstract in Atti di convegno
N., Fratelli; Orabona, Rossana; Cavalli, Cecilia; Azzaretto, Vita Valentina; Vitucci, Annachiara; C., Zanardini; Franceschetti, Laura; Fichera, Anna; ...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/493832
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact