1. Purpose and Research Questions of the CONREASON Project; 2. Methodology: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods; 2.1 Terminology; 2.2 Selection of Legal Systems; 2.3 Selection of 40 Leading Judgments; 2.4 The 5 Experts; 2.5 Questionnaire, Excel Table, Sample Judgment; Appendix A. Questionnaire for the Country Reports; B. Explanations of the 40 Leading Judgments Excel Table (Codebook); C. Sample Judgment Questions; Note on the Classification of Certain Arguments from US Constitutional Case Law; Note on the Classification of Certain Arguments from Israeli Constitutional Case Law

CONREASON – The Comparative Constitutional Reasoning Project. Methodological Dilemmas and Project Design

ITZCOVICH, Giulio
2015-01-01

Abstract

1. Purpose and Research Questions of the CONREASON Project; 2. Methodology: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods; 2.1 Terminology; 2.2 Selection of Legal Systems; 2.3 Selection of 40 Leading Judgments; 2.4 The 5 Experts; 2.5 Questionnaire, Excel Table, Sample Judgment; Appendix A. Questionnaire for the Country Reports; B. Explanations of the 40 Leading Judgments Excel Table (Codebook); C. Sample Judgment Questions; Note on the Classification of Certain Arguments from US Constitutional Case Law; Note on the Classification of Certain Arguments from Israeli Constitutional Case Law
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2015_09_jakab.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia: Full Text
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 555.48 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
555.48 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/476562
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact