The paper presents a prototypical tool to support the documentation of medical discussions. The development of this tool came after a long phase of requirement specification and prototyping activity, which allowed identifying two main functionalities for the tool, corresponding to two components. A first component is devoted to support the user in documenting clinical discussions, exploiting a graphical notation tailored to physicians’ habits. A second component exploits argumentation schemes in order to analyze documented discussions, possibly bringing to light weaknesses in the reasoning process.

An Experience in Documenting Medical Discussions through Natural Argumentation

FOGLI, Daniela;GIACOMIN, Massimiliano;
2013-01-01

Abstract

The paper presents a prototypical tool to support the documentation of medical discussions. The development of this tool came after a long phase of requirement specification and prototyping activity, which allowed identifying two main functionalities for the tool, corresponding to two components. A first component is devoted to support the user in documenting clinical discussions, exploiting a graphical notation tailored to physicians’ habits. A second component exploits argumentation schemes in order to analyze documented discussions, possibly bringing to light weaknesses in the reasoning process.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/443507
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact