Fingerprint techniques have a significant advantage in respect of watermarking: a fingerprint can be extracted in each moment of the lifetime of a multimedia content. This aspect is fundamental to solve the problem of copy detection mainly because many copies can be available in huge amount of data in circulation and because each copy can be attacked in several ways (compression, re-encoding, text-overlay, etc.). In this paper the problem of copy detection is studied and tested from two different point of views: content based and identification approaches. The results show that the proposed system is quite robust to some copy modifications and most of all show that the overall results depend on the evaluation method used for testing.
Identification versus CBCD: a comparison of different evaluation techniques
CORVAGLIA, Marzia;GUERRINI, Fabrizio;LEONARDI, Riccardo;ROSSI, Eliana
2010-01-01
Abstract
Fingerprint techniques have a significant advantage in respect of watermarking: a fingerprint can be extracted in each moment of the lifetime of a multimedia content. This aspect is fundamental to solve the problem of copy detection mainly because many copies can be available in huge amount of data in circulation and because each copy can be attacked in several ways (compression, re-encoding, text-overlay, etc.). In this paper the problem of copy detection is studied and tested from two different point of views: content based and identification approaches. The results show that the proposed system is quite robust to some copy modifications and most of all show that the overall results depend on the evaluation method used for testing.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CGLR_WIAMIS-2010_full-text.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: CGLR_WIAMIS-2010_full-text
Tipologia:
Full Text
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
199.22 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
199.22 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.