We studied six patients suffering from benign rolandic epilepsy of childhood with central temporal spikes who presented socalled ‘extreme somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs)’ following peripheral somatosensory stimulation. Stimuli were delivered to the fingers of one hand using both a triggered tendon hammer and low-intensity electrical stimulation. The electrical stimulation was delivered in sequences in different conditions (i.e. random order, 1, 3 and 10 Hz). Both tapping and electrical stimulation produced scalp evoked potentials in all subjects, characterized by a spike followed by a slow wave, similar in morphology and scalp distribution to the spontaneously occurring spikes. This paroxysmal activity was sensitive to stimulus rate; the number of evoked spikes was inversely related to the frequency of stimulation, being maximal at 1 Hz and disappearing at high frequencies (10 Hz). Spontaneous spikes disappeared during high-frequency stimulation but were present during lowfrequency stimulation. Averaged SEPs at 3-Hz stimulation showed a late high-amplitude component, identical in morphology and distribution to the single evoked spike. We therefore conclude that, in these subjects, the so-called ‘extreme SEPs’ are evoked spikes and that evoked and spontaneous spikes share common cortical sensorimotor generators. The evidence that these generators can be influenced by afferent input provides important information regarding the functional mechanisms involved in modulating cortical excitability in benign rolandic epilepsy. Moreover, we suggest that peripheral electrical stimulation can be used as an additional activation test in this kind of epilepsy

Influence of somatosensory input on paroxysmal activity in benign rolandic epilepsy with ‘extreme somatosensory evoked potentials’.

MINIUSSI, Carlo;
1998-01-01

Abstract

We studied six patients suffering from benign rolandic epilepsy of childhood with central temporal spikes who presented socalled ‘extreme somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs)’ following peripheral somatosensory stimulation. Stimuli were delivered to the fingers of one hand using both a triggered tendon hammer and low-intensity electrical stimulation. The electrical stimulation was delivered in sequences in different conditions (i.e. random order, 1, 3 and 10 Hz). Both tapping and electrical stimulation produced scalp evoked potentials in all subjects, characterized by a spike followed by a slow wave, similar in morphology and scalp distribution to the spontaneously occurring spikes. This paroxysmal activity was sensitive to stimulus rate; the number of evoked spikes was inversely related to the frequency of stimulation, being maximal at 1 Hz and disappearing at high frequencies (10 Hz). Spontaneous spikes disappeared during high-frequency stimulation but were present during lowfrequency stimulation. Averaged SEPs at 3-Hz stimulation showed a late high-amplitude component, identical in morphology and distribution to the single evoked spike. We therefore conclude that, in these subjects, the so-called ‘extreme SEPs’ are evoked spikes and that evoked and spontaneous spikes share common cortical sensorimotor generators. The evidence that these generators can be influenced by afferent input provides important information regarding the functional mechanisms involved in modulating cortical excitability in benign rolandic epilepsy. Moreover, we suggest that peripheral electrical stimulation can be used as an additional activation test in this kind of epilepsy
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Brain_Manganotti_98.pdf

gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 440.67 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
440.67 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11379/7365
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact